Saturday 22 May 2010

Everyone Says I Love You (Oblique and Declamatory)

Over at MusicalTalk, Comedy Thos has been chinwagging with Posh Josh on the subject of love.

When it comes to love, musicals are your genre. Romantic love songs are standard fare. But, as Thos and Josh point out, it's rarely approached head-on. More often than not, in the classics, it's oblique. They rightly point to Kern and Wodehouse's song "Bill" which has this lovely line:

His form and face
His manly grace
Are not the kind that you
Would find in a statue...
I love him because he's - I don't know -
Because he's just my Bill

Lovely rhymes aside, the sentiment is, on the face of it, not complimentary. Something similar is going on in "My Funny Valentine":

Is your figure less than Greek?
Is your mouth a little weak?
When you open it to speak
Are you smart?

Taken at face value the singer seems to be demonstrating their romatic feelings by describing the object of their love as a chubby, wonky-mouthed moron. But this is, thankfully, not the real message. The beautiful but resigned music tells us something else is going on. The singer is in love but not the idealistic kind. They love, not despite the faults of the other person but because of those faults. The song shows us their love is real.

It's also very satisfying dramatically. The Oblique Love Song allows for a sub-text. The songs above are superficially about one thing (complaining about somebody's imperfection) but are really about something else (the depth of the singer's love). That's more interesting for actor and audience alike. In fact the way Oscar Hammerstein uses "Bill" in Showboat makes it even more oblique. Julie sings it in a rehearsal as if it's just another audition piece of a past-their-best lounge act. But we know it means much more to her and that it's not really about some imaginary fella called Bill but about her lost love, Steve.

Moving on a few decades.

Here's the big love song from Phantom of the Opera:

Say you love me
Ev'ry waking moment
Turn my head with talk of summertime...
Anywhere you go let me go too
Love me - that's All I Ask of You

No obliqueness here. No, siree. This is about planting two feet on the floor and telling it like it is, singing what you mean and meaning what you sing. Let's call this a Declamatory Love Song.

Now I think this is one of the things that distinguishes the old musicals from the new. In the old shows the love songs tend to be more oblique, in the new ones they tend to be more declamatory. This may be generalising but I think there is some truth to it.

My sense is that both approaches can work but it does depend on the context. The kind of impassioned sentiment of "All I Ask of You" suits a boldly romantic show such as Phantom of the Opera. The problem is when that kind of declamatory style is used in smaller kinds of shows which call for a more oblique, character-led style. Imagine a modern-day, ordinary character - a student or waitress or an accountant, say - singing "Say you love/Every waking moment". It would sound overblown and silly.

The point is that the Declamatory Love Song has its dramatic limitations. It can only be used to tell certain kinds of stories. For new stories we need a new style of storytelling. Or, perhaps, an old one. Bring on the obliquity.

Sunday 16 May 2010

Stiles and Drewe vs. The Sherman Brothers

Sounds like a hippity-hop collective.

Ah, well. With Over the Rainbow on the telly, it reminds me that this attempt to stage an already-popular film musical with additional songs is nothing new. It's been done before with Mary Poppins which married the Disney songs of the Sherman Brothers, Robert and Richard, with new songs by British songwriters Stiles and Drewe. Their songwriting styles were close enough to be integrated smoothly into one show and, by my count, the final score is about half and half.

As one pithy critic put it, George Stiles and Anthony Drewe are the Tim Henman of musicals which, I suppose, makes Mary Poppins like winning the doubles at Wimbledon: very impressive but not quite the Big Prize. This is a touch unfair to Stiles and Drewe. As well as Mary Poppins their children's show, Honk, has played around the world. But there is still the nagging feeling that they haven't quite landed the big family classic - a Cats, a Joseph, a Sound of Music.

It's hard to say whether the stage version of Mary Poppins would have been the same success if we didn't already know and love those Sherman songs already. Songs such as "Feed the Birds", "Chim Chim Cher-ee" and "Supercaliwotsidoodah..." are part of the popular culture. Having said that, Stiles and Drewe did produce one of their best songs in "Practically Perfect". The word-play, internal rhymes and that quick little 4-note phrase on each "practically" all precisely catch the annoying smugness of the upright Mary Poppins:



Practically Perfect in ev'ry way
Practically Perfect so people say
Each virtue virtually knows no bound
Each trait is great and patently sound

And at the end of the chorus, that 4-note phrase is exquisitely stretched out, syllable by syllable, with the "ev'ry" turned into "ev-e-ry" like an elocution teacher patronising her pupils:


I'm so Prac-ti-cal-ly Perfect
In ev-e-ry way

This is subtle and clever songwriting from an undeniably talented team. But it's also fair to say they had a bit of head start with Mary Poppins.

There's another comparison to be made between Stiles and Drewe and the Sherman Brothers. Both teams also had a crack at Rudyard Kipling. The Shermans were recruited by Disney to do the songs for the animated version of The Jungle Book and Stiles and Drewe got their first break with a stage version of the Just So Stories.

The musical version of Just So has gone through various incarnations since its first productions in the mid-’80s but has never quite caught on (although I suspect its latest version may go on to do well on the schools and youth circuit). The Jungle Book, on the other hand, is still considered a Disney classic. You could put this down to power of the Big Mouse and you’d have a point. But Just So had Cameron Mackintosh on its side and he’s no slouch. Not to mention a roll call of top advisors, including Stephen Sondheim and Mike Ockrent, who helped to develop the material. Steven Spielberg even bought the animation rights. If ever a show was bound for the popular mainstream, it was surely this one. So here we have two songwriting teams of similar ability and style adapting a collection of short stories for children by the same author and each involving a lot of animal characters. Why was one adaptation more successful than the other?

I caught Just So at Chichester Festival Theatre a few years back. On the face of it Rudyard Kipling has a lot to offer a musical adaptor. His prose is full of word-play and sing-songy rhythms (“Before the High and Far-Off Times, O My Best Beloved, came the Time of the Very Beginnings”). But musicals can't rely on word-play alone. They have to have character or, to be more accurate, they have to express character. This is where Just So doesn't quite succeed. Much of the score is warm and witty and charming but the songs don't quite follow through with the characterisations. Let me take a couple of examples to make the point.

Take the characters of the Zebra and Giraffe who totter around in high heels like two Essex clubbers on a girls’ night out. In the spoken bits they whine and whinney in the vulgar venacular of today (“Wha’evaaar!”). But for their number “Pick Up Your Hooves and Trot” they’re suddenly singing in a completely different voice:


Wouldn’t it be amazing
If we could both be grazing
Far from the common herd?
So Pick Up Your Hooves and Trot, girl
Not another word!


That last little formulation,“Not another word!”, is just too quaint for a couple of loud-mouthed laddettes on the razz; it’s Sharon and Tracy sounding more like Flanders and Swann.

In The Jungle Book, on the other hand, the songs are much more in tune with the characters singing them. One of the great scenes in the film is when the King of the Monkey-People tries to persuade Mowgli to teach him how to be human. “I Wanna Be Like You” is a peach of a song and catches the frivolous chatter and general aping around of the wannabe human:

Now I'm the king of the swingers
Oh, the jungle VIP
I've reached the top and had to stop
And that's what botherin' me
I wanna be a man, mancub
And stroll right into town
And be just like the other men
I'm tired of monkeyin' around!

Oh, oobee doo
I Wanna Be Like You...

In a way, this is a similar kind of a song as "Pick Up Your Hooves and Trot". It has the same kind of animal-related word-play ("monkeying around"/"common herd") but the Sherman's song is much more in character. The slang, the swinging tempo, the energetic Dixie rhythm, the jazzy scat, the monkey-like “you-oo-oo” rhymes, the voices, the animation, it’s all so in synch. It’s a brilliant moment which has embeds itself in your mind because the song fits the characters so well. It’s the kind of moment that Just So, for all its charms, never quite finds.

Stiles and Drewe have been the "future" of British musicals for, ooh, a good twenty years now. But really they are old-fashioned writers. A lot of their songs sound as if they could have been written decades ago. That’s not a criticism, by the way. They are best known for writing for young children who probably care less about whether their music is fashionable or not than, say, a teenage audience might. That's also no bar to mainstream success; Lord Andy's music has never been fashionable. But the truth is that despite being the only musical writers, post-Lloyd Webber, to have made a real go of it, their songs and shows haven't quite matched the kind of popular success that the Sherman's songs enjoy.

Yet.

They have undoubted talents. With the right story, the right character and the right songs, who knows? Maybe they can win Wimbledon. Anything can happen.

(Mary Poppins, Just So and The Jungle Book available on Spotify)

Over the Rainbow (Go, Danielle!)

Now obviously this blog is concerned with the art of the true music-theatre form and, as such, would normally be above such shallow popularity contests.

(Danielle's a Wiz!)

But issues have been raised so that comment is required and, thus, I am dutifully casting a critical eye on this television programme.

(Toto'lly Awesome Danielle!)

One complaint has been that no new musical material is being showcased. What we need is not another talented musical singer but a few talented musical writers. Why doesn't Lord Andy support a reality TV show for new writers?

Well, plenty of reasons. For starters the contestants probably wouldn't be as pretty. Secondly no-one would be interested. How and why musicals work is only a topic of interest to a small number of people. Lots of people like musicals, only oddballs want to write them.

I think it's unfair to accuse Lord Andy of not supporting new work. If he liked a new musical I'm sure he'd be the first to put money into it. I suspect he just doesn't like a lot of the new work that's being produced. But what he's doing with Over the Rainbow is something else. Since the 70's musical theatre songs have generally been absent from the pop charts. By putting on a show where popular musical theatre songs are heard alongside popular chart songs, he's trying to prove that the showtunes can hold their own. Rather than trying to get showtunes into the charts the programme turns chart music into showtunes. That's a formula that does plenty to generate interest in musicals amongst a "modern" audience. And where there's an audience, there's a chance for new writers.

Duty done. Now don't ask me to watch Glee.